User Experience Comparison: Cursor vs Cody AI Coding Assistants
Project Information
Tags
AI Models Mentioned
Summary
A developer shares their positive experience switching from Sourcegraph's Cody to Cursor as their AI coding assistant. The user particularly highlights Cursor's superior code modification capabilities and well-designed interface, noting that it significantly improves their coding workflow compared to Cody's limitations with applying changes.
Best Practices
Evaluate AI Tool Effectiveness
Test different AI coding assistants to find the one that best matches your workflow needs
Prioritize Automatic Code Implementation
Choose tools that can automatically implement suggested changes rather than requiring manual implementation
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Avoid Manual Implementation of AI Suggestions
Don't rely on tools that consistently require manual implementation of suggested changes
Related Posts
Comparative Analysis of AI-Powered Development Tools: Bolt, v0, and Cursor
A detailed comparison of three major AI coding tools (Bolt, v0, and Cursor) based on hands-on experience. The analysis covers each tool's strengths, limitations, and ideal use cases, with particular focus on their applicability for different skill levels and project types. The post emphasizes the importance of actual coding skills while leveraging AI tools for enhanced productivity.
Enhanced Code Generation Using Cursor Rules Files with MDC Format for Convex Development
A developer shares their positive experience using new .mdc cursor/rules files for improved code generation in Convex projects. The implementation demonstrates significant improvement in one-shot code generation compared to previous methods, reducing the need for multiple prompts and showing enhanced effectiveness over traditional documentation-based approaches.
Proper Usage Guidelines for AI Coding Assistants: Understanding Cursor's Role
A critical discussion about the misuse and misunderstanding of the Cursor AI coding assistant. The post emphasizes that users should treat Cursor as a helpful tool rather than a complete replacement for human developers, drawing an analogy to calculator usage.
Improving Cursor AI Code Generation Through Interactive Questioning
A user shares a valuable tip for improving code generation quality in Cursor AI by explicitly requesting it to ask clarifying questions. The post highlights how adding a simple prompt rule can prevent hallucinated code and lead to more accurate, contextually appropriate code generation through interactive refinement.
Comprehensive Guide to Cursor AI Features: Agents, Composer, and Chat - Real-world Usage Patterns
A software engineer and dev agency owner shares their experience using Cursor AI over two months, breaking down the strengths and limitations of three main features: Cursor Agents, Composer, and Chat. The post provides practical guidelines for when to use each feature effectively, based on real-world project implementation experience.